<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What materials are exempt from CPSIA lead testing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/cpsia-basics/what-materials-are-exempt-from-cpsia-lead-testing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/cpsia-basics/what-materials-are-exempt-from-cpsia-lead-testing</link>
	<description>Explaining the Facts and Dispelling the Myths about the CPSIA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:15:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wacky Hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/cpsia-basics/what-materials-are-exempt-from-cpsia-lead-testing/comment-page-1#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Wacky Hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/?p=486#comment-315</guid>
		<description>If you feel this statement is misleading, take it to the CPSC.  In their guidance document they specifically said that they were considering adhesives used in bindings to be inaccessible.  I was surprised that they would make such a statement knowing, as you noted, that adhesives are sometimes visible and touchable at the top and bottom of the binding.  But that&#039;s what they said.

Also, post-1985 books are still covered by the stay of enforcement until February 2010, adhesives, laminates, and all.  (Book-plus books, spiral bound etc. are not covered by the stay.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you feel this statement is misleading, take it to the CPSC.  In their guidance document they specifically said that they were considering adhesives used in bindings to be inaccessible.  I was surprised that they would make such a statement knowing, as you noted, that adhesives are sometimes visible and touchable at the top and bottom of the binding.  But that&#8217;s what they said.</p>
<p>Also, post-1985 books are still covered by the stay of enforcement until February 2010, adhesives, laminates, and all.  (Book-plus books, spiral bound etc. are not covered by the stay.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/cpsia-basics/what-materials-are-exempt-from-cpsia-lead-testing/comment-page-1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisthecpsia.com/?p=486#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I think your statement that &quot;All books printed after 1985 are considered to be made of exempt materials.&quot; is a bit misleading.  Many books produced today have adhesive&#039;s exposed on the top and bottom of the binding.  That&#039;s not to say anyone was sloppy with the glue and its dripping out, but it is exposed.  Also, many paperback trade books are covered in a laminate.  Thus, A LOT of books produced today will require some testing and certification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your statement that &#8220;All books printed after 1985 are considered to be made of exempt materials.&#8221; is a bit misleading.  Many books produced today have adhesive&#8217;s exposed on the top and bottom of the binding.  That&#8217;s not to say anyone was sloppy with the glue and its dripping out, but it is exposed.  Also, many paperback trade books are covered in a laminate.  Thus, A LOT of books produced today will require some testing and certification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

